Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

Very best safest distance from a 5G cell Tower system?

If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They look like little boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.

These smaller towers are replacing larger specially-designed cell towers. Although  how to protect your body from 5g 're not as visible but they can still create problems for those who live nearby.
A of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the safe distance that an individual can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indication of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. It's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram spread over a Gram of tissue.

But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies and has the potential to create more energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body areas. This can lead to many possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin conditions such as dermatitis and skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to create a general power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the peak SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds

If you've ever used a cell phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is due to the transmitting power of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away you are from it.

While this sounds like an ideal idea, the reality is that those living close to towers could be more vulnerable to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India discovered that people living within 50 meters from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those who lived farther distance from them.

However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days. Another study has demonstrated that exposure to extreme levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, used in wireless communications, may penetrate the human body's outer layer, the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin acts as a protective barrier against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and entry of toxic substances. It is also the largest organ in the human body and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure

The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on several assumptions that are not supported by evidence from science. These include the erroneous assumption that exposures to RF radiation are safe due to minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. the heating of tissues).

The assumption also ignores the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals and the effect of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These theories are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be relied upon for health-protection exposure standards.



Furthermore to  how to protect yourself from 5g towers , ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR), which can be described as not a sufficient dosimetric tool for determining the level of exposure to RF radiation. In particular the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies above 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such as sunlight. The interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents could produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation along with exposure to sunlight can raise the chance of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.